The World According To Bob

Bob Allen is a philosopher and cyber libertarian. He advocates for the basic human rights of men. Bob has learned to cut through the political nonsense, the propaganda hate, the surface discourse, and talk about the underlying metamessage that the front is hiding. Bob tells it like it is and lets the chips fall where they may. If you like what you read be sure to bookmark this blog and share it with your friends.

Name:
Location: United States

You can't make wrong into right by doing wrong more effectively. It's time for real MEN to stand up and take back our families, our society, and our self respect. It is not a crime to be born a man. It is not a crime to act manly.

Wednesday, January 21, 2009

Dr. Freud and Mr. Chief Justice

Psychologists have known since the writings of famed psychologist Dr. Sigmund Freud a century ago, that much of our behavior comes from a subconscious part of our mind. When we try to fool ourselves and others our lies cause conflict between our subconscious and our conscious intentions. Our action may come out different, our words stumble, or we speak the opposite of the lie we intended. When this happens it has a name, its called a “Freudian slip” of the tongue. A guilty conscious is one of the primary causes of a Freudian slip.

At the coronation of B. Hussein Obama as the Messiah and President of these United States, Chief Justice Roberts was supposed to administer the oath of office. His small part was to recite the oath of office prescribed by the US Constitution, a law he is intimately familiar with. But it was a lie, a really blatant lie. For more on the lie and the facts of Obama’s life and citizenship see Obama “Admits” facts in Berg vs. Obama

For months there have been numerous law suits brought to the US Supreme Court by citizens asking the court to do its job and declare His Holiness Obama ineligible to be President. The evidenced presented to the Court in support of the many law suits shows clearly that Obama was born in Kenya and later became a citizen of Indonesia by his own declaration. When Justice Roberts had to stand and lie in front of a million witnesses and a hundred million watching on TV, he couldn't do it. When he tried to perpetrate a monstrous lie that violated the very constitution upon which his career depends, his conscience got the best of him. His mouth wouldn't form the words. He couldn't manage to administer an oath to uphold the Constitution to a man who’s very presence on the podium violates the constitution he’s swearing to uphold. His words came out scrambled as his subconscious struggled to speak the truth.

There was some deep psychology going on with the Chief Justice over his public dishonesty. Chief Justice Roberts had to say the words “faithfully….preserve, protect, and defend the constitution of the United States.” But in saying those words he was trashing and violating the constitution of the United States, and he knew it. His subconscious mind became deeply conflicted, and his mouth failed to form the lie.

B. Hussein Obama, of course, has lived a lie all his life. His Chicago political machine practically invented corrupt politics with its ongoing fraud, deceit, and lies to the people. Obama has lied to the people every day of his public career, and does so with the convincing smile of a lying weasel. Despite the Freudian slip of Chief Justice Roberts, Hussein Obama spoke some words, not those prescribed in the constitution, and accepted the office. Obama understands that none of his cheering throng standing before the podium, nor on the fascist NYC media would question anything he says.


Article II Section 1.
No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President.

Before he enter on the execution of his office, he shall take the following oath or affirmation:--"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."


Obama is not qualified to be President as required by our Constitution, and has not taken the oath of office as written, and required by the Constitution. The US Supreme Court is participating in the massive fraud and trashing of constitutional law in the United States. In a very real sense these United States have ceased to exist for the Constitution that formed our union has been abrogated by the highest authorities it created.

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

23 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Roberts failed to use a teleprompter and thus fumbled the words. President Obama quickly corrected Roberts' error.

January 21, 2009 12:35 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yeah. Obama has a lot of errors to correct! But he and his intelligent, educated, articulate and charming wife will be up to the task.

January 21, 2009 2:21 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous:
You can't make wrong into right by doing wrong more effectively.

January 21, 2009 2:48 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

There probably wouldn't have been any fumbling had the Teleprompter jesus of the 57 States not interrupted Justice Roberts in the first place.

January 21, 2009 2:53 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Obama retook the Oath for an added measure of assurance (1/21/09).

January 21, 2009 5:43 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yes, but there was no Bible present.

January 21, 2009 6:00 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous and anonymous:
1. Can you provide a source for the info about retaking the oath of office in private?
2. If there was no bible present, what about a Quoran?

The US Constitution does not suggest nor require a bible. Obama's Inauguration speech sentence about men of all faiths and of no faith is one that Bob whole heatedly supports.

January 21, 2009 6:17 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to readers:
Bob has found a yahoo story (and others) which says that Obama finally took the required oath of office on Wednesday evening. According to the Constitution, anything he did, as President, before that is not valid. Laws signed, executive orders signed, etc., are invalid until the oath is taken.

And all of that presumes that he is eligible to be President of these United States, which he is not.

January 21, 2009 6:27 PM  
Blogger Ted said...

Take the test.

FIRST QUESTION: Who IS the actual and lawful 44th President of the USA?

ANSWER: Joe Biden

Biden was initially the Acting President for at least 5 minutes under either the Constitution’s Article 2 or the Constitution’s 20th Amendment, from 12:00 Noon 1/20/09, having already taken his Oath of Office and before Obama completed his ‘oath’ at approximately 12:05 PM, 1/20/09. Under the 20th Amendment if the President-elect shall have failed to qualify, or alternatively under Article 2 if the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term, being 12:00 Noon 1/20/09, which ability and/or qualification includes that he take the Article 2 oath “before he enter on the execution of his office,” then either the Presidency shall devolve on the Vice President under Article 2 or the Vice President shall act as President under the 20th Amendment. (The importance of the oath in ‘commencing’ an ‘Obama Presidency’ — rather than merely the 1/20/09 Noon time — is confirmed by the re-take of the ‘oath’ by Obama at the White House on 1/21/09 after the first ‘oath’ was NOT administered by Justice Roberts NOR recited by Obama in the words as required under Article 2.)

This is significant because at such time that the Supreme Court finally rules on the merits on Obama’s disqualification as not being an Article 2 “natural born citizen” (clearly he is NOT), Biden’s automatic status (without needing to take a separate Presidential Oath) of being President would be predicated upon four different bases: First, having been Vice President under Article 2; second, having been Vice President-elect under the 20th Amendment; third, having been actual President in the hiatus before Obama took the ‘oath(s)’; and fourth, retroactively deemed President during the full period of the Obama usurpation so that the acts of the Federal Government under the usurpation can be deemed authorized and/or ratified by Biden’s legitimacy.

SECOND QUESTION: Who will be the 45th President?

ANSWER: Hillary Clinton

One must assume that Bill and Hillary Clinton have been aware of all of the above. Biden’s wife recently “let the cat out of the bag” on the Oprah Show that both Biden and Hillary had considered alternatively Veep or Secretary of State, in either case, setting up Hillary to be President on a vote of the Democratic Congress if need be.

THIRD QUESTION: Is Obama an unwitting victim of this troika or a knowing participant?

ANSWER: Yet undetermined.

January 21, 2009 11:32 PM  
Blogger bruce said...

buckweat is a racist,commie who will ruin this country and steal our freedoms.his black panther buddy bobby rush has already introduced a bill to disarm the descent people of america and bongo can't wait to sign it.

January 22, 2009 7:53 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bruce, you have no apparent concept of spelling or grammar. Do you expect anyone to take you seriously?

January 22, 2009 3:42 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com
/2009/01/22/on-35th-anniversary-
obama-praises-roe-v-wade-decision/

On 35th Anniversary, Obama Praises Roe v. Wade Precedent

"President Barack Obama reaffirmed his commitment to protecting abortion rights on Wednesday, the 35th anniversary of the landmark Supreme Court decision, Roe v. Wade, and said that it 'stands for a broader principle: that government should not intrude on our most private family matters.'"

Women rejoice. Obama will be a great friend to women.

"There was also speculation about whether President Obama would use today’s anniversary of the 1973 Supreme Court decision to reverse the so-called “Mexico City policy,” which forbids the flow of federal money to international family planning organizations that provide abortions or related services and counseling."

Women worldwide will rejoice, if this happens. Obama will be a great friend to women.

January 22, 2009 3:44 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Think tax dollars going for the Mexico City policy would make Obama a great friend for any American?

Clearly, for the good of the U.S., women should not be allowed to vote.

January 22, 2009 9:17 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous:
Hussein Obama and Joe Biden were the two most misandrist Senators before they became P & VP. Now they are the most misandrist President and Vice President ever. We knew that before the election. Females and manginas voted for them.

The recent election was as sexist as it was racist. Men and whites, or particularly white men, are the targets of government hate.

MEN will suffer more in the coming few years than any time in our history. Look for more incidents such as the "DC Sniper" or the "VT massacre" as beaten down men revolt against the evil misandrist femernment.

January 23, 2009 6:06 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Note to 9:17 anonymous: How do you plan to keep women from voting? It would take a Constitutional amendment to invalidate the 19th Amendment. That won't happen. Women will keep having the right to vote. bob refuses to go on national television to make an argument against it, as do all other MRAs. If you won't do anything to stop it, women will keep voting. They don't care what you or bob thinks. Without national attention to it, women's right to vote will not be challenged. They will keep on doing as they please.

January 23, 2009 10:41 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

http://uk.reuters.com/
article/topNews/
idUKTRE50M4WJ20090123

Obama to lift restrictions on abortion funding

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. President Barack Obama on Friday will lift restrictions on U.S. government funding for groups that provide abortion services or counselling abroad, reversing a policy of his Republican predecessor George W. Bush, an administration official said.

January 23, 2009 10:55 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous (10:41 AM)
First wave feminists forced through a couple of really bad amendments in the early part of the 20th century. The 18th amendment was later repealed, and the 19th amendment still needs to be repealed.

January 23, 2009 11:09 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous (10:55 AM)
Obama is an ardent misandrist supporter of the feminist agenda.

January 23, 2009 11:11 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bob, the 19th Amendment will not be repealed. It would take a Constitutional Amendment to do it, and that won't happen. Not without a great deal of national discussion, debate, etc. that must be conducted in the mainstream. As long as you and other radical MRAs lurk and reach only a handful of readers, that won't happen. It must be brought into the mainstream.

January 23, 2009 11:54 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous:
Don't kid yourself. The mistake of the 19th amendment can be repealed as easily as the 18th amendment.
If it is not repealed, female suffrage is rapidly bankrupting the nation. After the complete collapse the new constitution of the rebuilding can just not include such nonsense.

January 23, 2009 12:49 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What about those women who vote YOUR way, Bob? No vote for them in national, state or local elections?

How about all men? Suppose (say 50%) of registered male voters refuse to vote Bob's way? Will they still have the vote?

January 23, 2009 4:10 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous:
A study of the long term negative effects of female suffrage can be found HERE

Universal suffrage is generally a losing plan for governments. Many men don't have education or property or any real vested interest in the long term success of the society. A more limited form of democracy is much more successful on a long term basis.

January 23, 2009 5:19 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Many men don't have education or property or any real vested interest in the long term success of the society"

Many men have an excellent education, property, good jobs.... and they vote Liberal Democrat.

And there are a good many conservative Republican women voters.

January 23, 2009 6:52 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home