The World According To Bob

Bob Allen is a philosopher and cyber libertarian. He advocates for the basic human rights of men. Bob has learned to cut through the political nonsense, the propaganda hate, the surface discourse, and talk about the underlying metamessage that the front is hiding. Bob tells it like it is and lets the chips fall where they may. If you like what you read be sure to bookmark this blog and share it with your friends.

Name:
Location: United States

You can't make wrong into right by doing wrong more effectively. It's time for real MEN to stand up and take back our families, our society, and our self respect. It is not a crime to be born a man. It is not a crime to act manly.

Tuesday, June 16, 2009

Annual Father's Day Hate

Father's Day Hate articles and cartoons by all the leftist media is happening right on schedule again this year. I found the following cartoon from a leftist news source called "The Onion.

It is typical of the anti-father, anti-men hate that the media spews every year. These hate bigots should be horse whipped before being hung.

Your local media, print or broadcast, will be republishing all the same hate for Father's Day. They get it from AP and other misandrist sources. The editors are bred for hate and think that anti-men hate is "celebrating" fathers. Phone your local newspaper or TV outlet and complain.


KellyFathersDay

Hate is a media tradition on Father's Day

The truth about divorce is that females file about 90% of divorces and the top 3 reasons all amount to her boredom. She's tired of living with a good, hard working, dependable, but boring, father for her children. So she comes up with a lie, often files false “DV” or other “abuse” accusations on the advice of a lieyer, kicks him and takes him to the cleaners.

The other half of “families” in the US are the new feminist “family” which only has a mother and some bastard children by some random fuck she probably never got the name of. Having a long series of whoring affairs is not boring like a good marriage. Its the new feminist ideal.

Don't expect the truth about families and fathers to show up in the media on Father's Day. They all toe the feminist line and spend Father's Day week running a series of anti-men hate articles and cartoons. Count on it this year and every year. Kick her in the shin when you meet one of the medial bigots at the store.

Above I posted the hate cartoon because it had good graphics. Its supposedly a "joke." Hate is often disguised as a "joke." It doesn't change the hate in the cartoon, nor the reason that they publish it for Father's Day.

It is typical of all the major media who run hate for Father's Day. Here is another example of the typical daily Father's Day hate series from a print newspaper:

Time to disarm violent domestic abusers
Federal and state laws prohibit convicted domestic-violence offenders from possessing firearms, but enforcement of those laws has been lax, write guest columnists Merril Cousin and Nan Stoops. They urge all law-enforcement agencies to follow proven strategies for getting guns out of the home.

By Merril Cousin and Nan Stoops
Special to The (Seattle) Times

Most print, Internet, and TV media are running their annual week long anti-men hate specials for Father's Day this week. Call your local media and give them your manly opinion of their hate propaganda.

Labels: , , , , , ,

49 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Don't be such a child. It's a joke. There are plenty about mothers' day and women too. If it's meant in malice, it's wrong. When it's only intended to raise a chuckle out of the receiver what's the harm?

One quick google search:
http://www.kidzworld.com/ecards/images/mother-1.jpg
http://rlv.zcache.com/mothers_day_card_multi_task-p137189488713206392tdtq_400.jpg

June 16, 2009 2:55 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous:
Every year during he week before Father's Day they publish a series of anti-men hate articles and cartoons. That is very different from what they publish before Mother's Day. They do it every year. Yes, they intend the hate.

June 16, 2009 4:39 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous sow:
Thoughtful comments that add to the conversation are always welcome on The World According to Bob even when you may disagree with Bob. However, comments that consist primarily of feminist rhetorical tactics and add nothing to the conversation are not allowed. Please review Bob's rules for comments on the left margin.

June 16, 2009 6:32 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

http://www.salon.com/news/feature
/2009/06/15/neo_nazis_army
/index.html?source=rss&aim=/news
/feature

Neo-Nazis are in the Army now

Why the U.S. military is ignoring its own regulations and permitting white supremacists to join its ranks.

"Since the launch of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, the U.S. military has struggled to recruit and reenlist troops. As the conflicts have dragged on, the military has loosened regulations, issuing "moral waivers" in many cases, allowing even those with criminal records to join up. Veterans suffering post-traumatic stress disorder have been ordered back to the Middle East for second and third tours of duty.

The lax regulations have also opened the military's doors to neo-Nazis, white supremacists and gang members — with drastic consequences"

June 17, 2009 10:48 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous:
The use of code phrases such as "Neo-Nazis," "white supremacist," and similar euphemisms are anti-white racist hate speech. It is not surprising that racist hate like that article is being published by the anti-white racist media bigots.

The real new Nazis are the Democratic Socialist Labor Party that is "changing" the US to be a fascist nation patterned after the German National Socialist Labor Party. We now have a supreme leader ("fuhrer") with absolute authority over government and industry.

June 17, 2009 12:26 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

How long will you love simplicity?

June 19, 2009 2:14 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You do know that THe Onion is a parody site, and not an actual news source, right?

June 19, 2009 4:53 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Should there be strip joints that cater to women? The kind that have Chippendale-type male dancers so the ladies can get their engines revved just like men do.

June 20, 2009 1:16 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous:
They already have female customer strip clubs in many cities. Bob accidentally walked into one in Phoenix one night. There were several near-naked men waiters and dancers. Lots of noisy females. Not my kind of entertainment.

June 20, 2009 1:52 PM  
Anonymous Vincymon said...

I would haveto agree with Bob on that one. I love my father. Today my dad made a joke about how empty the stores were today, and that another man at the shop even said "What is wrong with you people, did you forget that today was Father's day ?"

I am going to be a father some day. And do you know what ?

We don't spend all mother's day arguing about abortion; so why in the <<>> do people spend father's day giving us a d@mn lecture !

Its enough we have to hear complaining about deadbeats all year round, do we really need this on Father's day as well ?

June 21, 2009 2:23 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Today our local newspaper ran a front page editorial championing late term abortion clinics. They called it "a war." Yes, its a war against the rights of fathers. A war that transfers total control of our children to females. The local misandrist media chooses Father's Day to run front page hate against the rights of fathers. Shame, shame, shame on each and every one of them.

June 21, 2009 4:56 PM  
Blogger Sanity said...

Bob, I don't think "euphemism" mean what you think it means.

Otherwise, what the heck is "neo-nazi" a euphemism for.

June 21, 2009 5:56 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sometimes a joke is just a joke. Just because you can come up with some twisted path of logic that makes something offend, doesn't mean it was actually meant to do harm. I thought that was the exclusive territory of radical feminism, but I guess I was wrong.

June 21, 2009 9:16 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

How manybof those to-be aborted babies does Bob assume these fathers will take and care for when their mothers don't want anything go do with them? If these women had real men in their lives, they wouldn't be considering abortion because a man would be there to provide for them.

June 22, 2009 8:10 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous:
We will never know how many because fathers no longer have any legal rights to decide about our children at all.

Before feminism ruined it, we once had an common arrangement for men to take care of women who were the mothers of our children. It was called "marriage." Feminism destroyed marriage. The failure of young women to find a husband to take care of her child is the fruit of feminist hate. A young pregnant single female has only her evil hate mongering mothers to blame.

June 23, 2009 5:27 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Prior to feminism, America was a functional Patriarchy. Thanks to feminism it is now a dysfunctional Matriarchy. In 1957, prior to the modern feminist movement the out of wedlock birth rate was 4%, fifty years later in 2007, it was almost 40%, It gets slightly higher every year. How hi it will go remains to be scene. A much higher percentage of single mothers live in poverty when compared to married
mothers. Feminism has led to the impoverishment of women not the empowerment of women.

June 23, 2009 8:25 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Prior to feminism, America was a functional Patriarchy. Thanks to feminism."

Great points! The significantly higher crime rate in post feminist America is another factor to consider

June 23, 2009 11:33 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Abortion is a bigger issue for feminists even more so than the right to vote.It is also one of the main reasons why western societies are in decline,feminism leads to demographic suicide.All one has to do is look at Europe.The birth rates of most European countries are below replacement level because of high abortion rates.Feminism is an idealogical dead end that leads to cultural and racial suicide.

June 23, 2009 12:45 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Abortion is a bigger issue for feminists even more so than the right to vote.It is also one of the main reasons why western societies are in decline,feminism leads to demographic suicide.All one has to do is look at Europe.The birth rates of most European countries are below replacement level because of high abortion rates.Feminism is an idealogical dead end that leads to cultural and racial suicide.

June 23, 2009 12:48 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Abortion, the right to vote--it sounds almost like women think they're human beings with the right to direct their own lives. Like they're not just accessories to men's lives, but entitled to lives of their own.

June 23, 2009 2:19 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

" Abortion, the right to vote--it sounds almost like women think they're human beings with the right to direct their own lives. Like they're not just accessories to men's lives, but entitled to lives of their own."

That is the problem.

Hey, I bet that iranian woman, Nada, supported women's rights.

Now she's dead.
A bullet through the heart.

What do you think about that?

Also, if I were the Iranians I would have MOWED the female women's rights activists down. No arrests, just bullet after bullet.

I wouldn't have shot men.


Women's rights is not good for men and must be destroyed.

Liberty is good for men, when it is applied only for men.

June 23, 2009 6:53 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

alpha of alientrap.org/forum wrote:

""I will sign a petition for your isolation anytime.""


Let's imagine if such a fantasy became a reality:

//A petition? Then I would know your name, and when "they" did come for me, I would dispatch atleast one, if I dispatched all, I would find you next. Boat ride to CZ?

//If I were confined, alpha, if I ever got out and you were involved, my life's work would then be to destroy you, and make you understand that you were being destroyed while it was happening.

//Perhaps I would use some methods that the royals used to use.


It's wonderful that all you freedom lovers want me to be locked away because I say anti-women's rights things. This is why I cheer when Iran mows down people like you in the street: I know that freedom does not ever exist: The ideological group in power always jails, murders, and destroys the lives of those they see as their idealogical enemies.

Your kind jail men for having wives that are under 18, jail men for saying "hateful" things, and generally destroy the people you don't like.

I now cheer when the same happens to you. Unfortunately the "conservative" oppressive government is rare and the "liberal pro-women's rights" oppressive government has spread all around the globe now.

June 24, 2009 2:04 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Hey, I bet that iranian woman, Nada, supported women's rights.

Now she's dead.
A bullet through the heart.

What do you think about that?"

There was an interesting news analysis of the situation in Iran on the radio yesterday. Apparently the young woman has become a martyr and a powerful symbol to the resistance movement, thanks in part to modern media like YouTube. According to the newsmen, if Mousavi had simply been declared winner on June 12 or a recount declared, he would likely have made very few changes from the current administration. But since the "Supreme Leader" chose to attempt to crush opposition and force Mousavi into the role of reformist and potential martyr himself, that would likely change if he is put into power. The young people who are putting their lives at risk challenging their leaders who have chanted "death to America" for the last 30 years want a different Iran, one that includes many liberating changes for everyone, including more freedoms for women. The news report described her as a "modern, well-educated young woman, the symbol of a new Iran." Or words to that effect; I did not tape the report.

What do I think of Nada? Depends on how the situation in Iran progresses. If pro-Western reform takes place she will have helped improve the lives of Iranian women as well as helping to end three decades of anti-Western hostility.

June 24, 2009 2:30 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous:
Nada is a creation of the misandrist media. There were many men killed, and their names are never reported. Only a young woman is IMPORTANT to the anti-men sexist media to make into a martyr for the feminist cause. All the many dead men are nameless and faceless. Nobody sees their many faces. Nobody hears their names. They are just dead men.

June 24, 2009 2:50 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It's not that martyred men are "unimportant". The focus was on women since their rights and safety had been so severely violated in Iran and similar cultures.

June 24, 2009 3:30 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Many Nadas are dead. That is a good lesson for female feminists: if you're known you die.

Men who choose to have young wives, or who choose to not allow a woman to tear up their family, they get imprisoned and killed in most parts of the world today.

It's wonderful that this week some of the feminists got the blood in their hearts spilled all over the ground, and others were arrested: this is what traditional men all around the world get every day.

Also Musavi is scum that helped kill hudreads of our marines in Lebenon.

Guy who, as a student, had something to do with the embassy takover vs some guy who have hundreds of our men murdered in their barracks?

I'll take the old student radical rather than the murderer of men.

--MikeeUSA--

June 24, 2009 5:09 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Keep in mind also that Nada's death was caught on video, and that video went worldwide in a matter of hours. That's a big part of her fame and symbolism, picture/thousand words and all that. As more protesters are beaten and killed, more video will make its way around the world whether the victims are male or female. More martyrs = more unrest. Good.

What's the line from Star Wars? "The more you tighten your grip the more systems will slip between your fingers" or something like that? The tyrants can't control YouTube, Twitter or the other personal media. They're losing control and they're scared. A thousand Nadas will destroy them. And everybody has a cell phone with video capabilities.

MikeeUSA, you sound very frustrated and angry. Why does the possibility of Iranian reform at long last upset you?

June 25, 2009 11:38 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Here is the opinion of AI, a man on the http://alientrap.org/forum . Please register there and give him a piece of your mind. He is happy when men are jailed for having young wives, and is happy that women's rights is spreading throughout the globe.

http://alientrap.org/forum

[quote="ai"][quote="tundramagi"]Your kind jail men for having wives that are under 18, jail men for saying "hateful" things, and generally destroy the people you don't like.[/quote]
Good. This only to ensure that the world isn't filled with nutjobs and psychos. A safe and sane world.

[quote="tundramagi"]It seems like Men are losing their voice all around the globe, that men are losing the "permission" to have the families and nice females they desire (that all men desire), and women are gaining.[/quote]
Good.
[/quote]

June 25, 2009 1:10 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"MikeeUSA, you sound very frustrated and angry. Why does the possibility of Iranian reform at long last upset you?"

The Iranian reformers want:
the marraige age for females to be raised to 18 (and to punish those men who disobey this.)

Females to beable to divorce men.

Men to be punished for "marital rape" and other things (domestic violence etc).

Most countries in the world have followed these proscriptions. Iran and Saudia are part of a handful that haven't. Saudia is slipping, Iran has aswell.

I pray that ever female women's rights activist in the street gets mowed down (but the men remain unharmed).

If I were the iranian governments I would have killed thousands more by now then they have (with snipers ofcourse).

Death To women's Rights.
Viva Men's Liberty.

--MikeeUSA--

Every killing of a feminist is a small and uncommon victory of revenge for men.

Females should be married once they are able to have children.

June 25, 2009 1:16 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Looks like the Iranian govt is blazing away at their own feet as fast as they can. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world
/2009/jun/24/neda-soltan-iran-family-
forced-out

Way to drum up even more support for the martyrs. Finally will we be able to hear anything from Iran other than "Great Satan" this and that? Reform would make that part of the world a lot safer, and maybe get their damn nuke program under control.

In other news, looks like Michael Jackson croaked. Why am I not surprised? http://www.foxnews.com
/story/0,2933,529103,00.html?mrp

June 25, 2009 3:55 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

http://www.newsweek.com/id/202008?GT1=43002

Now here's a twist of irony, an article by a couple of feminists who are suggesting that women may want to consider marrying for money after all?

June 26, 2009 8:48 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous:
Women have always been whores. Whether a young women is making a marriage arranged by her father, or a 30 something feminist is trying to snag a man of means, the man's money is always primary. The new part of the article is that they are figuring out how much money they can make in the divorce even before they marry the guy.

Marriage under feminist law, community property, domestic violence, child support, marital rape, etc. etc. etc. makes no sense for men.

June 26, 2009 11:12 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I poked around the Alien forum, but didn't see AL or Mikee. Which discussion?

June 26, 2009 2:38 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The entire forum where the discussion was held (/dev/null) just got deleted, that's why you didn't find them. Mike goes under the alias of tundramagi there.

June 26, 2009 6:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

http://www.newser.com/story/47869/cops-bust-dad-who-married-off-girl-14-for-beer.html

How do we stop the police from opressing men who wish to marry young females.

Bob what do we do? What have you done?

We can do nothing right?
We will never do anything.

Why do we always sulk and hide from the law, why do we never destroy it and those who opress men?

June 26, 2009 8:11 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Now, after all this talk of Iran and such we should remeber that Iran, like any true Islamic country which follows Islamic law, enjoys amputating Men's hands, feet,etc.

Those having any part in such actions should be murdered.

--MikeeUSA--

June 26, 2009 11:54 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous:
The only effective way to stop a blue gun thug is with .30-06 caliber or larger. .50 is highly effective if you can get one or make one.

June 27, 2009 7:44 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bob,

The .50 BMG is an awesome weapon, Very expensive though, prices being around $7K! A typical loading is 200 grains of smokeless powder behind a 720 grain projectile! I have heard reports of snipers taking out targets up to 2 miles away!

Unfortunately for us here in CA, the anti-gun legislators coupled with Arnolds willingness to sign
AB50 has lead to its demise?

June 27, 2009 9:51 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bob: this is just my opinion, and I don't intend any disrespect by this, but I think that advocating violence against feminists is just playing into their hands. We shouldn't kick them in the shins -- we should unite politically and whoop them fair and square where it counts: in the ballot box.

I also feel that we should be very specific when using words such as "cunt," which is entirely appropriate when applies to false rape accusers like Crystal Mangum but which should not apply to all women.

We should also use accurate statistics. The number of divorces filed by women is closer to two thirds, not 90%, although your point is well taken.

June 29, 2009 1:46 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous:
Trying to compete with at a ballot box with numerically superior females is doomed to failure. What you advocate is to continue the failure of the past century that has resulted in ever increasing female domination of every part of the culture. That just does not work, has not worked, and will not work.

Reciting bogus feminist "statistics" doesn't work either.

June 29, 2009 3:46 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Then what does work? Women can vote. There are more of them. Blogs reach a few dozen people and complete among thousands of other blogs. Acts of violence only swell the prison population. Mainstream media doesn't discuss repeal of the 19th at all. Islamic overthrow is unlikely, and would suck if it did happen. What does work?

June 29, 2009 4:07 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous:
Bob does not advocate any criminal or illegal acts. Bob is only an observer of the human condition.

From an extensive reading of history, the only effective way that significant social change has ever been accomplished has been through the effective use of arms. They can be employed on a limited basis to cut off the leadership of those who get in the way of progress and intimidate the rest, or they can be used by armies (much smaller then a majority) who take action to control and change the majority.

June 29, 2009 4:50 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/01/opinion/01wed4.html?_r=1&ref=opinion

"We welcome President Obama’s decision to create a new post, White House adviser on violence against women, and his appointment of a seasoned advocate for victims to fill it."

July 01, 2009 2:07 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The feminists don't always get their way at the ballot box, though. If they did then George W. Bush would never have been elected twice. Men aren't being beaten down at the ballot box -- they just don't care about men's rights at this point.

The NOW claims to have half a million members, and probably really has less than half of that. If there were a million MRAs contributing regularly to a men's rights organization then the "matriarchy" would be in huge trouble.

July 04, 2009 2:44 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why is there no mens' rights organization equivalent to NOW?

July 04, 2009 4:34 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous:
The dominance of female hate groups such as NOW comes from the majority of female voters. Only female hate groups get government funding, protection on college campuses, etc.

July 04, 2009 6:15 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think men are doing something about it. What does every woman dream of, even if she lies about it?

Marriage and kids.

In 2004, 22%, I think it was, of men in the US said they will never under any circumstances marry.

That number has obviously grown.

When a group of people take over and get out of control, the way to stop them is to cut off their source of sustenance.

When women have to work until they die, because they can't find a man to do it for them, they will start to listen.

Or, if not, a patriarchal society will conquer us.

And, so goes history.

Anonymous age 67

July 05, 2009 8:23 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

how about mass euthanasia of the entire human race?

July 05, 2009 3:58 PM  
Anonymous Charles said...

I see manginas and feminist cunts think shaming men is just "a joke" and "shouldnt be taken seriously"

Hey you fembots and pussywhipped simps what if I said this...

"Hey women stop whoring around with thugs and bad boys and you wouldnt have so many out of wedlock children...

Happy cunt/mothers day"

But since its a "joke" why dont you cunts and simps "get a life"

August 21, 2009 5:12 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home